PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.43%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 20.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.53%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 14.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-42.33%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 52.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-26.59%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 26.04% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.12%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-15.15%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.29%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.00%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 10.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.10%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.15%
D&A growth less than half of FSLR's 2.34%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1856.65%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 97.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2390.43%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 442.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
64.58%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 2973.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
54.91%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 2445.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.61%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4449.22%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 2869.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5635.70%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 2359.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-264.15%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 111.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1454.16%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1823.58%
Net margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1511.76%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1581.48%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.31%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.