PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.13%
Revenue decline while FSLR shows 44.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-28.27%
Cost reduction while FSLR shows 25.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
71.96%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of FSLR's 113.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
120.84%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 47.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-56.68%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 2.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-36.64%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.02%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 6.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.32%
Total costs reduction while FSLR shows 23.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.07%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 237.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.50%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
539.41%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 148.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
664.31%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 148.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
71.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSLR's 307.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
63.64%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSLR's 181.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
400.69%
Other expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
554.91%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 312.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
741.05%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 185.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1297.03%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSLR's 273.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
130.29%
Net income growth below 50% of FSLR's 320.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
195.75%
Similar net margin growth to FSLR's 190.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
116.67%
EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 317.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 314.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.