PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-16.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
41.64%
Positive growth while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.49%
Margin expansion while FSLR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.78%
R&D growth while FSLR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-72.18%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 421.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.54%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.16%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-24.42%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 13.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.61%
D&A growth while FSLR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-115.01%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
67.92%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.78%
Operating margin growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-106.72%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 17.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-145.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-149.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-179.60%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-262.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-278.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-258.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-258.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.21%
Share count increase while FSLR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.38%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.