PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSLR's 59.38%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.05%
Cost growth less than half of FSLR's 54.91%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.76%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 188.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.07%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 81.25% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.04%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 7.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.13%
Operating expenses reduction while FSLR shows 12.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Total costs growth less than half of FSLR's 49.09%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
70.85%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x FSLR's 4.75%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
41.05%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSLR's 4.62%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-86.01%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 668.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.62%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 100.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
76.66%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 6.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
68.99%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 41.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-108.59%
Other expenses reduction while FSLR shows 489.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-96.25%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 89.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 93.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-191.86%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 107.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-94.39%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 84.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.63%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 90.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.87%
EPS decline while FSLR shows 84.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 84.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-8.82%
Diluted share reduction while FSLR shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.