1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.05%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-95.29%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-91.56%
Gross profit decline while FSLR shows 21.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-90.93%
Margin decline while FSLR shows 22.63% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-16.93%
R&D reduction while FSLR shows 12.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.89%
Operating expenses growth while FSLR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
32.39%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSLR's 163.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-98.31%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 4.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-408.04%
EBITDA decline while FSLR shows 40.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-446.58%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 25.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
52.17%
Similar operating income growth to FSLR's 61.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
48.54%
Similar operating margin growth to FSLR's 63.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-671.98%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-79.94%
Pre-tax income decline while FSLR shows 54.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSLR shows 55.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.35%
Tax expense reduction while FSLR shows 23.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.73%
Net income decline while FSLR shows 57.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.81%
Net margin decline while FSLR shows 59.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.26%
EPS growth below 50% of FSLR's 56.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2636.84%
Diluted EPS decline while FSLR shows 57.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.11%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSLR's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.