PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-97.19%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-97.76%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-15.10%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2918.10%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSLR's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-94.65%
G&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-50.74%
Marketing expense reduction while FSLR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.66%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-96.14%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-30.89%
Interest expense reduction while FSLR shows 30.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-97.69%
D&A reduction while FSLR shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
67.27%
EBITDA growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1063.64%
EBITDA margin decline while FSLR shows 4.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
53.01%
Operating income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1570.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
69.57%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of FSLR's 96.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
57.89%
Pre-tax income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1396.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
105.26%
Tax expense growth while FSLR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
65.32%
Net income growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1132.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
71.83%
EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.83%
Diluted EPS growth while FSLR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-71.98%
Share count reduction while FSLR shows 0.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-72.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.