PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
97.07%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-4711.83%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4124.34%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
65.82%
R&D growth above 1.5x MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
76.43%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.42%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-513.61%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 72.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-435.45%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 49.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.54%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 66.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-211.12%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 39.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
220.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MAXN's 100.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-227.22%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-185.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.24%
Tax expense growth while MAXN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-285.53%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-236.42%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-281.93%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-281.93%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Share count change of 0.51% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.51%
Diluted share change of 0.51% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.