PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.67%
Positive growth while MAXN shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.97%
Cost increase while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-177.61%
Gross profit decline while MAXN shows 73.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-172.76%
Margin decline while MAXN shows 51.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.80%
R&D reduction while MAXN shows 3.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-29.30%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.53%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
19.12%
Total costs growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.34%
Interest expense growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.76%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
7.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MAXN's 72.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MAXN's 49.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.93%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MAXN's 66.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
38.06%
Similar operating margin growth to MAXN's 39.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-371.19%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 100.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-65.33%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 70.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 46.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-327.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-76.09%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 73.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.08%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 51.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 73.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.