PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.09%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's 6.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
2.70%
Cost growth less than half of MAXN's 5.69%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 87.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MAXN's 76.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-11.33%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
4.45%
G&A change of 4.45% while MAXN maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth while MAXN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.40%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MAXN's 4.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-45.63%
Interest expense reduction while MAXN shows 1.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.11%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-93.30%
EBITDA decline while MAXN shows 25.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.86%
EBITDA margin decline while MAXN shows 29.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.88%
Operating income decline while MAXN shows 11.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.39%
Operating margin decline while MAXN shows 16.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.14%
Other expenses reduction while MAXN shows 44.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-110.21%
Pre-tax income decline while MAXN shows 16.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while MAXN shows 21.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.36%
Net income decline while MAXN shows 17.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.33%
Net margin decline while MAXN shows 22.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.94%
EPS decline while MAXN shows 17.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.67%
Diluted EPS decline while MAXN shows 17.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count change of 0.06% while MAXN is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while MAXN shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.