PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Similar revenue growth to RUN's 18.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
97.07%
Cost growth above 1.5x RUN's 2.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-4711.83%
Gross profit decline while RUN shows 92.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4124.34%
Margin decline while RUN shows 62.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
65.82%
R&D growth above 1.5x RUN's 29.67%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RUN's 1.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
76.43%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RUN's 2.20%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.42%
Interest expense growth less than half of RUN's 13.03%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.18%
D&A reduction while RUN shows 4.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-513.61%
EBITDA decline while RUN shows 115.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-435.45%
EBITDA margin decline while RUN shows 110.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.54%
Operating income decline while RUN shows 38.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-211.12%
Operating margin decline while RUN shows 47.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
220.35%
Other expenses growth while RUN reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-227.22%
Pre-tax income decline while RUN shows 19.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-185.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while RUN shows 31.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.24%
Tax expense growth while RUN reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-285.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-236.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.51%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 1.96%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.51%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RUN's 5.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.