PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.39%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 31.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.00%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 27.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-28.35%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 83.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.20%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.60%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
9.50%
Marketing expense growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.49%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 22.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.02%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 25.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.22%
Interest expense change of 2.22% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-10.36%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-177.56%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-195.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-360.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-419.62%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-378.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-375.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-438.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-375.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-438.07%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-380.00%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18766.67%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.90%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-50.22%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.