PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.22%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 31.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
3.90%
Cost growth less than half of SEDG's 27.41%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
64.11%
Similar gross profit growth to SEDG's 83.23%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
17.87%
Margin expansion below 50% of SEDG's 38.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.03%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
0.79%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.49%
Other expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 1378.99%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.14%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 22.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
42.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SEDG's 25.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
55.68%
Interest expense change of 55.68% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.04%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
494.36%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
383.25%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.95%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.05%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
887.44%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
271.95%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
223.50%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
121.12%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
245.39%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
204.43%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
325.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 200.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
316.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 200.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.51%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.51%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.