PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 31.87%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
57.81%
Cost growth above 1.5x SEDG's 27.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
56.16%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SEDG's 83.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.33%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.39%
R&D growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
6.07%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Other expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 1378.99%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.08%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 22.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
40.01%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SEDG's 25.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.35%
Interest expense change of 2.35% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.62%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
634.58%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
368.88%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
482.57%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.19%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-93.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.82%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.28%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
272.18%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.18%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.08%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.15%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.18%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.