PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.21%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SEDG's 31.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
216.39%
Cost growth above 1.5x SEDG's 27.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-72.55%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 83.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-76.58%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.94%
R&D growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 1378.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.83%
Similar operating expenses growth to SEDG's 22.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
21.98%
Similar total costs growth to SEDG's 25.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
1.40%
Interest expense change of 1.40% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
11.35%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-34.98%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.83%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-601.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-76.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-95.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.81%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.57%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.69%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.