PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.59%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SEDG's 31.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
16.38%
Cost growth 50-75% of SEDG's 27.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
62.44%
Similar gross profit growth to SEDG's 83.23%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
34.70%
Similar margin change to SEDG's 38.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-15.68%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-18.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.58%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 22.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.67%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SEDG's 25.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.74%
Interest expense change of 3.74% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
0.42%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.27%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.14%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 14.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-26.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.24%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
681.19%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.34%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.97%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.97%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.99%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.99%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.