PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.90%
Revenue growth below 50% of SEDG's 31.87%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.76%
Cost growth less than half of SEDG's 27.41%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.90%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SEDG's 83.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.91%
Margin expansion below 50% of SEDG's 38.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.04%
R&D growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
11.58%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.56%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 22.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.81%
Total costs growth less than half of SEDG's 25.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
33.16%
Interest expense change of 33.16% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-15.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
118.55%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.03%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-46.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.11%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
206.33%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.01%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.32%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-94.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
42.34%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.05%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
42.25%
EPS growth below 50% of SEDG's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
42.25%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SEDG's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.39%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.39%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.