PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of SEDG's 31.87%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
11.17%
Cost growth less than half of SEDG's 27.41%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-41.96%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 83.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-44.49%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 38.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.15%
R&D growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
46.11%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SEDG's 22.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.84%
Total costs growth less than half of SEDG's 25.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-21.87%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2175.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2085.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.08%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-195.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-181.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-169.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 2.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1468.30%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-198.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-185.26%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.56%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.56%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.