PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.35%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 31.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.79%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 27.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
26.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SEDG's 83.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.11%
Similar margin change to SEDG's 38.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-25.47%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-31.19%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.34%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 22.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.97%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 25.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.93%
Interest expense change of 33.93% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-11.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
91.25%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.65%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.67%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.22%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-41.95%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
57.11%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
54.20%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-67.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
62.22%
Net income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.66%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
62.30%
EPS growth below 50% of SEDG's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
62.30%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SEDG's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.12%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.34%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.