PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 8.22%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
97.07%
Cost growth above 1.5x SEDG's 11.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-4711.83%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 2.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4124.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
65.82%
R&D growth above 1.5x SEDG's 9.38%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.63%
G&A reduction while SEDG shows 21.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SEDG's 6.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
76.43%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SEDG's 10.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.42%
Interest expense change of 6.42% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-3.18%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 7.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-513.61%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 0.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-435.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-256.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
220.35%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-227.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-185.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.24%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-285.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-236.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-281.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.51%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.24%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.51%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.