PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.64%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-44.86%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 9.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
103.15%
Positive growth while SEDG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
103.30%
Margin expansion while SEDG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-49.89%
R&D reduction while SEDG shows 2.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
17.66%
Similar G&A growth to SEDG's 19.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while SEDG shows 6.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.26%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 6.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.53%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.79%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-35.85%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 27.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
88.00%
EBITDA growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
87.42%
EBITDA margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.82%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.99%
Operating margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-352.04%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 72.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
76.73%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.60%
Pre-tax margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.44%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.91%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 32.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
78.93%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 26.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
79.81%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 31.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
79.81%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 31.94%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.