PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.77%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 3.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.99%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-392.47%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 8.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-546.07%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 4.77% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.72%
R&D reduction while SEDG shows 6.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
16.75%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SEDG's 4.13%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-23.78%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 1.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.43%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.54%
D&A growth less than half of SEDG's 38.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-72.14%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 19.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.84%
EBITDA margin decline while SEDG shows 15.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.79%
Operating income decline while SEDG shows 17.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.41%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
113.65%
Other expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.12%
Pre-tax income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
169.18%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.28%
Similar net income growth to SEDG's 47.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
25.58%
Net margin growth 50-75% of SEDG's 42.57%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
43.75%
Similar EPS growth to SEDG's 42.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
43.75%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SEDG's 44.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.41%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.41%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.