PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.09%
Revenue growth below 50% of SEDG's 26.32%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.70%
Cost growth less than half of SEDG's 26.55%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 25.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.38%
Margin expansion while SEDG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.33%
R&D reduction while SEDG shows 4.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.45%
G&A growth while SEDG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SEDG's 12.21%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.40%
Total costs growth less than half of SEDG's 23.20%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-45.63%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.11%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-93.30%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 38.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.86%
EBITDA margin decline while SEDG shows 9.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.88%
Operating income decline while SEDG shows 45.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.39%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 15.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-110.21%
Pre-tax income decline while SEDG shows 6.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.36%
Net income decline while SEDG shows 25.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.94%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 24.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.67%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 22.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.82%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while SEDG shows 2.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.