PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.27%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 11.10%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.98%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 14.49%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
12.71%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 2.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.80%
R&D growth above 1.5x SEDG's 12.81%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SEDG's 10.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.23%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SEDG's 13.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.90%
Interest expense change of 27.90% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
159.91%
D&A growth above 1.5x SEDG's 7.02%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-185.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-139.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-366.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-172.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-128.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
133.47%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-89.47%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-89.47%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.33%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.