PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SEDG's 6.45%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
6.05%
Cost growth above 1.5x SEDG's 2.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.76%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 17.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.07%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 10.46% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.04%
R&D reduction while SEDG shows 13.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.13%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 91.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Total costs growth less than half of SEDG's 18.91%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
70.85%
Interest expense growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.05%
D&A growth while SEDG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-86.01%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
76.66%
Operating income growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.99%
Operating margin growth while SEDG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-108.59%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 320.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-96.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-191.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-94.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.82%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.