PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.35%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 5.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.05%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 2.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-38.74%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 14.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.89%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 8.49% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
30.34%
R&D growth above 1.5x SEDG's 1.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while SEDG shows 21.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.65%
Operating expenses growth while SEDG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.76%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.47%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.05%
Similar D&A growth to SEDG's 8.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-259.08%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 144.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.44%
EBITDA margin decline while SEDG shows 131.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.01%
Operating income decline while SEDG shows 2892.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-301.93%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 2734.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-954.79%
Pre-tax income decline while SEDG shows 228.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1064.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 209.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
142.96%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-817.67%
Net income decline while SEDG shows 564.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-909.53%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 526.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-825.00%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 564.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-825.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 571.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of SEDG's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.56%
Diluted share reduction while SEDG shows 0.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.