PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.24%
Positive growth while SEDG shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
61.46%
Cost growth less than half of SEDG's 253.31%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-253.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-187.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.39%
G&A growth above 1.5x SEDG's 5.65%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
254.97%
Marketing expense growth while SEDG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 158.66%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
153.87%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SEDG's 220.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
0.60%
Interest expense change of 0.60% while SEDG maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-7.29%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 8.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-571.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-444.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-215.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-994.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-461.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-355.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while SEDG shows 1093.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-390.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-297.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.15%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.15%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.35%
Share count reduction while SEDG shows 0.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-38.35%
Diluted share reduction while SEDG shows 0.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.