PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.67%
Growth of 6.67% versus flat Solar revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
10.97%
Cost growth of 10.97% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-177.61%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-172.76%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.80%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-29.30%
G&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.53%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is 17.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
19.12%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.12%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
16.34%
Interest expense change of 16.34% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-2.76%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 12.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
7.87%
EBITDA growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
33.93%
Operating income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
38.06%
Operating margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-371.19%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -15.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-65.33%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -27.31%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-54.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is -25.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-327.69%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-76.09%
Net income decline while Solar median is -49.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-65.08%
Net margin decline while Solar median is -36.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.00%
EPS decline while Solar median is -39.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is -39.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.04%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.