PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.09%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
2.70%
Cost growth 50-90% of Solar median of 4.74%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine sustainable cost advantages.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 16.60%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
123.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.33%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
4.45%
G&A change of 4.45% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth while Solar reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
2.40%
Total costs growth 50-90% of Solar median of 2.96%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
-45.63%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-32.11%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-93.30%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is 38.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.86%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 19.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-129.88%
Operating income decline while Solar median is 27.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-127.39%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is 15.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-85.14%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 11.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-110.21%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is 31.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-109.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 33.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-51.75%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-112.36%
Net income decline while Solar median is 33.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-111.33%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 29.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-112.94%
EPS decline while Solar median is 34.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-114.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 34.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate strategy.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.