PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.12%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
18.92%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.93%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
97.18%
Growth of 97.18% versus flat Solar gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
55.44%
Margin expansion while Solar median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
13.42%
R&D change of 13.42% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
9.49%
G&A change of 9.49% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.27%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.99%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
17.54%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.13%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
6.26%
Interest expense change of 6.26% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
18.05%
D&A change of 18.05% versus flat Solar D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
418.55%
EBITDA growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
308.78%
EBITDA margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
104.53%
Income change of 104.53% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
103.57%
Operating margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
152.47%
Other expenses change of 152.47% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify control.
268.89%
Income change of 268.89% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
233.14%
Margin change of 233.14% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
220.63%
Tax expense change of 220.63% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
136.23%
Income change of 136.23% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
128.56%
Net margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
136.36%
EPS change of 136.36% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
127.27%
Diluted EPS change of 127.27% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
6.93%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.13%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
9.44%
Diluted share change of 9.44% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.