PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.43%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -3.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-19.53%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -5.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-42.33%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-26.59%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-21.12%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-15.15%
G&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.29%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is -2.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-19.00%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -7.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.10%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
0.15%
D&A growth below 50% of Solar median of 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
-1856.65%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -1.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2390.43%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
64.58%
Income change of 64.58% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
54.91%
Margin change of 54.91% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
47.61%
Other expenses change of 47.61% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify control.
4449.22%
Income change of 4449.22% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5635.70%
Margin change of 5635.70% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-264.15%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1454.16%
Income change of 1454.16% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1823.58%
Margin change of 1823.58% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1511.76%
EPS change of 1511.76% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1581.48%
Diluted EPS change of 1581.48% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
8.33%
Diluted share change of 8.33% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.