PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.69%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
12.20%
Cost growth 50-90% of Solar median of 13.61%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine sustainable cost advantages.
102.35%
Growth of 102.35% versus flat Solar gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
62.68%
Margin expansion while Solar median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
-38.72%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
48.07%
G&A growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.59%. Jim Chanos would check for bloated overhead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.34%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 20.17%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
15.79%
Total costs growth near Solar median of 14.63%. Charlie Munger would verify industry norms.
18.79%
Interest expense change of 18.79% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-78.48%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 1.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-13.89%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -23.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-30.77%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is -9.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1259.49%
Operating income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1032.20%
Operating margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
174.48%
Other expenses growth while Solar reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
194.72%
Pre-tax income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
136.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-48.72%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
824.29%
Net income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
643.11%
Net margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
830.77%
EPS growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.81%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.