1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.13%
Revenue decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
1784.74%
Cost growth of 1784.74% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-56.88%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-47.96%
Margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.23%
R&D reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
1401.26%
G&A change of 1401.26% versus flat Energy overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-12.39%
Marketing expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.11%
Operating expenses change of 19.11% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-0.27%
Total costs reduction while Energy median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-32.60%
Interest expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
6953.88%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.98%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
64.53%
EBITDA change of 64.53% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
57.20%
Margin change of 57.20% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-44.93%
Operating income decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-74.89%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
83.17%
Other expenses change of 83.17% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify control.
55.33%
Income change of 55.33% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
46.10%
Margin change of 46.10% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
86.13%
Tax expense change of 86.13% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
26.00%
Income change of 26.00% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
10.70%
Margin change of 10.70% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-294.44%
EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
86.35%
Diluted EPS change of 86.35% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.06%
Diluted share change of 0.06% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.