PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
0.85
0.5–0.75x RUN's 1.35. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are sufficiently covered.
0.47
0.5–0.75x RUN's 0.89. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
0.12
Below 0.5x RUN's 0.45. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-3.43
Both companies show negative interest coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.
0.15
Positive short-term coverage while RUN shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our cash flow advantages in a challenging market.