1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-13.45%
Negative ROE while FSLR stands at 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-3.03%
Negative ROA while FSLR stands at 2.95%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.26%
Negative ROCE while FSLR is at 3.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
16.28%
Gross margin 50-75% of FSLR's 23.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-0.94%
Negative operating margin while FSLR has 31.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-15.79%
Negative net margin while FSLR has 26.10%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.