PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-11.41%
Negative ROE while FSLR stands at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-3.70%
Negative ROA while FSLR stands at 0.50%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-3.88%
Negative ROCE while FSLR is at 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
18.66%
Similar gross margin to FSLR's 20.44%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-7.03%
Negative operating margin while FSLR has 7.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-12.58%
Negative net margin while FSLR has 7.76%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.