PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.59
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 10.22. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.85
P/S 50-75% of FSLR's 8.22. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
1.66
P/B 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 1.22. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
-5.11
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-6.08
Negative operating cash flow while FSLR shows P/OCF of 138.11. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
1.66
Fair value ratio 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 1.22. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better prospects.
-3.80%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 2.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-19.56%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.