PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-8.04
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 92.46. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.35
Similar P/S to FSLR's 5.31. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.73
P/B above 1.5x FSLR's 0.85. Michael Burry would check for potential asset overvaluation.
-6.06
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-7.50
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
1.73
Fair value ratio above 1.5x FSLR's 0.85. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
-3.11%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-16.51%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.