PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.41
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 22.22. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.37
P/S 50-75% of FSLR's 7.59. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
-41.13
Negative equity while FSLR shows P/B of 0.99. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-11.99
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-14.23
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-41.13
Negative fair value while FSLR shows ratio of 0.99. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-3.90%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-8.34%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.