PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-3.66
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 21.35. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.07
Similar P/S to FSLR's 6.44. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
-11.09
Negative equity while FSLR shows P/B of 0.85. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-27.57
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-87.95
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-11.09
Negative fair value while FSLR shows ratio of 0.85. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-6.83%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-3.63%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.