PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-2.85
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 17.06. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
40.27
P/S above 1.5x FSLR's 23.59. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
-1.97
Negative equity while FSLR shows P/B of 3.29. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-59.54
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-67.22
Negative operating cash flow while FSLR shows P/OCF of 123.51. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-1.97
Negative fair value while FSLR shows ratio of 3.29. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-8.79%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 1.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.68%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.