PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.66
Negative P/E while Energy median is -1.70. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
2.20
P/S 1.1-1.25x Energy median of 1.90. John Neff would demand superior growth or margins to justify premium.
-1.39
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.28. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-33.63
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is -11.22. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-33.63
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is -7.14. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-1.39
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.28. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-15.08%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is -0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-2.97%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is -0.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.