PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
153.85%
Net income growth of 153.85% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
15.17%
D&A expands slightly while Coal is negative at -16.25%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
100.00%
Working capital of 100.00% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-258.19%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Coal median is 34.42%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
169.21%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Coal median of 3.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
50.56%
CapEx growth under 50% of Coal median of 22.68% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.47%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Coal median is -51.55%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-30.36%
Reduced investing yoy while Coal median is -12.85%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
241.90%
Debt repayment growth exceeding 1.5x Coal median of 55.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a strong commitment to reducing leverage vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.