0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73317.96%
10Y CAGR of 73317.96% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
73317.96%
5Y CAGR of 73317.96% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 8385.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
28.58%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 430.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-171.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 48.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
181.61%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 181.61% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
181.61%
Net income/share CAGR of 181.61% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
29.82%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 131.36%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-103.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 890.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-103.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WHC.AX is at 140.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-104.87%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.