PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449386.90%
10Y CAGR of 1449386.90% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
288.78%
Positive 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
128.62%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 446.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
18.69%
Positive OCF/share growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6365.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
58.96%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 58.96% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
66.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of WHC.AX's 101.02%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-130.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-100.71%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 168.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-109.41%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WHC.AX is at 10.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-123.73%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.