0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2651911.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 684.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 10.53%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
195.55%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 2574.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
307.27%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 113.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-2.96%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 13.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
156.11%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 1728.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
161.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x WHC.AX's 108.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
742.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 8.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.11%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-146.29%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.