0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2848309.72%
10Y CAGR of 2848309.72% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
664.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 272.62%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
54.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 193.72%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
509.72%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 10053.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
92445.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 451.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
379.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x WHC.AX's 339.37%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
252.17%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 252.17% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
14.85%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 561.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
709.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to WHC.AX's 647.87%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-93.13%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 10.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
130.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 30.77%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
36.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 23.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.