PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.45%
Negative EBIT growth while YAL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-80.45%
Negative operating income growth while YAL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
5682.20%
Net income growth of 5682.20% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
5320.00%
EPS growth of 5320.00% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
5326.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 5326.67% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
4.50%
Share change of 4.50% while YAL.AX is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
4.34%
Diluted share change of 4.34% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.92%
OCF growth of 42.92% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-41.89%
Negative FCF growth while YAL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 13398.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 13398.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 13398.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
73.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 73.70% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
73.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 73.70% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
73.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 73.70% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
162.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
162.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
162.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-26.50%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while YAL.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-26.50%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.30%
We have a declining book value while YAL.AX shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
328.76%
SG&A growth of 328.76% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.