PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 9351.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 9351.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 53.90% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
53.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 53.90% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
56.60%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of YAL.AX's 303.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
8.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
8.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
37.02%
Below 50% of YAL.AX's 94.74%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 12.22%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.