PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1839247.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 636.03%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2405.31%
Positive 3Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
185.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 185.47% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
144.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x YAL.AX's 110.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
219.67%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
75.04%
Similar net income/share CAGR to YAL.AX's 77.73%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
95.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to YAL.AX's 101.98%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-130.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while YAL.AX is 108.53%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-94.95%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while YAL.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-78.61%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
240.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.