PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2651911.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 1570.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of YAL.AX's 107.29%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
195.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 195.55% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
307.27%
Positive OCF/share growth while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-2.96%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 249.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
156.11%
Below 50% of YAL.AX's 1892.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
161.32%
Below 50% of YAL.AX's 476.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
742.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 208.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.11%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-146.29%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.